A last generic fall storytime before it's finally December and I feel obligated to move on to winter, despite whatever it's doing outside.
Fall Leaves: Colorful and Crunchy
Martha E. H. Rustad, illustrated by Amanda Enright
ISBN: 9780761385059
A really good junior nonfiction title with information about photosynthesis and plant growth and leaf formation. Illustrations are cartoony and clear and stylized in a slightly exaggerated manner. Interesting choice and a fun difference from the majority which use photographs. It has "chapters" of a few spreads each, which was a big hit for my little ones to be big enough to listen to a "chapter book."
Red Leaf, Yellow Leaf
Lois Ehlert
ISBN: 0152661972
This book always surprises me that it is so narrative-heavy. The (unseen) narrator tells us all about her sugar maple tree and how it was grown and developed and nursery'ed, and talks about the colors of the leaves and the different types of trees and resulting leaf colors.
Fletcher and the Falling Leaves
Julia Rawlinson, illustrated by Tiphanie Beeke
ISBN: 9780061134012
Fletcher the fox kit is experiencing his first fall, and so he's worried when his favorite tree starts turning brown and then (oh horrors) losing it's leaves! He tries very hard to save them, but it's a lost cause. There's a beautiful surprise on the last pages of the now-winterized tree (love when books have just a smidge of glitter or fun printing tricks to them!) Amazingly evocative and sweet, and more than a bit sad, despite the happy ending.
Showing posts with label fox. Show all posts
Showing posts with label fox. Show all posts
Monday, December 4, 2017
Wednesday, January 15, 2014
The Sandman: The Dream Hunters (graphic novel), Neil Gaiman, P. Craig Russell
The Sandman: The Dream Hunters (graphic novel)
Neil Gaiman, illustrated by P. Craig Russell, colors by Lovern Kindzierski
Based on the illustrated novella by Neil Gaiman and Yoshitaka Amano
ISBN: 9781401224240
Read January 15, 2014
Snap judgement: it was nifty, but I still like the original better.
That said, there were a few individual places where I thought the story benefitted from the style of comic panels, or from specific artistic choices.
Firstly, the fox actually has green eyes! I wouldn't trade Amano's stylized faces for the world, but it was nice to see expressions and actual eyeballs on the monk and fox.
I loved the use of the red and white robe for the fox's human form. There were a few panels in particular that were just nicely done; when she jumps over the fire and changes, when she is teasing the onmyoji, and when the dreamland pair shifts from man and fox to a couple.
I loved that the use of Dream's white-on-black text made the Fox King's identity more obvious.
I liked that the onmyoji was fat and somewhat attractive, and the sequence showing his fears was very well done.
I LOVED the trio of weavers. Super-nasty and disturbing.
The sequence where the monk walked into Dreaming was very powerful in this version, because more of the landscape and events were pictured. The destruction of the geta, and the interactions with Cain and Abel in particular were haunting.
I also am glad that I read the original first, because I could see in my mind the text behind many of the image sequences (like the fox eating the frog), but it did make me aware of at least one minor alteration; the grandfather originally choked on a mochi and here that phrase was altered to an 'unripe peach.' Made me wonder why alter that, and not just change it to "rice cake" and for that matter, why that, and leave onmyoji or oni or tengu as they are?
As an aside, I find myself uncomfortably aware of my prudish American upbringing, where reading text about 'private' body parts is a-ok, but actually seeing them is somehow worse. I'm trying to get past that myself, but if a child wanted to read this story, I have to admit I'd rather they read the illustrated novella than looked at the graphic novel. Graphic indeed, I suppose.
Final verdict: if you are somehow prevented from owning both versions, then the original is still the best choice. I just can't express how perfect the artistic partnership is between those two masters of their media.
However, in the real world, where people have bookshelves full of The Sandman, this is a beautiful and haunting addition in it's own right, and does a lovely job of adapting the original to another medium without feeling like a copy, but without losing the soul of the story.
Neil Gaiman, illustrated by P. Craig Russell, colors by Lovern Kindzierski
Based on the illustrated novella by Neil Gaiman and Yoshitaka Amano
ISBN: 9781401224240
Read January 15, 2014
Snap judgement: it was nifty, but I still like the original better.
That said, there were a few individual places where I thought the story benefitted from the style of comic panels, or from specific artistic choices.
Firstly, the fox actually has green eyes! I wouldn't trade Amano's stylized faces for the world, but it was nice to see expressions and actual eyeballs on the monk and fox.
I loved the use of the red and white robe for the fox's human form. There were a few panels in particular that were just nicely done; when she jumps over the fire and changes, when she is teasing the onmyoji, and when the dreamland pair shifts from man and fox to a couple.
I loved that the use of Dream's white-on-black text made the Fox King's identity more obvious.
I liked that the onmyoji was fat and somewhat attractive, and the sequence showing his fears was very well done.
I LOVED the trio of weavers. Super-nasty and disturbing.
The sequence where the monk walked into Dreaming was very powerful in this version, because more of the landscape and events were pictured. The destruction of the geta, and the interactions with Cain and Abel in particular were haunting.
I also am glad that I read the original first, because I could see in my mind the text behind many of the image sequences (like the fox eating the frog), but it did make me aware of at least one minor alteration; the grandfather originally choked on a mochi and here that phrase was altered to an 'unripe peach.' Made me wonder why alter that, and not just change it to "rice cake" and for that matter, why that, and leave onmyoji or oni or tengu as they are?
As an aside, I find myself uncomfortably aware of my prudish American upbringing, where reading text about 'private' body parts is a-ok, but actually seeing them is somehow worse. I'm trying to get past that myself, but if a child wanted to read this story, I have to admit I'd rather they read the illustrated novella than looked at the graphic novel. Graphic indeed, I suppose.
Final verdict: if you are somehow prevented from owning both versions, then the original is still the best choice. I just can't express how perfect the artistic partnership is between those two masters of their media.
However, in the real world, where people have bookshelves full of The Sandman, this is a beautiful and haunting addition in it's own right, and does a lovely job of adapting the original to another medium without feeling like a copy, but without losing the soul of the story.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)